Dissonance
Independent research / Software problemsBy C-Point Labs

The step before validation

Know what to build
before you build it

Evidence-backed problem reports for software builders. Fewer problems. More reasons to pay attention.

Launching soon. Previews are open; public accounts and purchases are not.

Read before you build

Your next starting point.

The current free report. The same format, evidence standard and care as every paid edition.

First edition / In preparation

Good research takes more than a promising headline.

Our first public report is being edited. It will appear here only after its evidence, competitors and source links pass review.

No invented sample. No unsupported counts.

01 / The method

From public discussion to a clearer decision.

  1. 01 / Collect

    Listen in the right places.

    We collect public discussions from sources that allow it, within defined retention and publication limits.

  2. 02 / Curate

    Keep the recurring problems.

    We look for independent people describing the same problem, and check the named competitors and current workarounds.

  3. 03 / Read

    Start with a useful brief.

    You get a short report you can act on. Read it, follow the evidence, then talk to people before building.

02 / Inside every report

Enough substance. No noise.

A consistent editorial format. Read it on screen, download the Markdown, or print a clean PDF from your browser.

  1. The problem (own words)
  2. Who has it
  3. Evidence
  4. Current workarounds and spending
  5. Competitors
  6. Where these people are
  7. What we do not know
  8. Sources and licence notes

03 / Why trust the work

The evidence is the point. So are its limits.

A floor, not a score.

At least five independent authors across two sources. Recent competitor checks. Re-checked links. Those are publication requirements—not proof of demand.

No scraped quotes. No names.

Our reports use our own words, aggregate counts and source links. Blocked and unknown sources stay out of published evidence.

Read the source policy and assessment →

We build in the open.

We build the best findings ourselves and publish the results. A report is a starting point, never a promise that a product will sell.

04 / Choose your reading

One good problem can be enough.

Start with a free report. Then buy one at a time, keep credits for later, or read every published edition with a subscription.

Launching soon.

Public signups and purchases are not open yet. Read the previews, or leave your email for a launch notification.

Notify me at launch →

EUR, incl. 21% VAT. Launch prices are placeholders and may change before launch. Credits never expire. Subscriptions can be canceled from your account.

05 / A few fair questions

Before you dive in.

Where does the evidence come from?

Publication currently permits Stack Exchange, GitHub, Bluesky, and the Home Assistant and Grafana forums under source-specific limits. Other sources may inform private research, but blocked or unreviewed sources never count toward a public report. Public availability alone is not permission.

What does ‘independent authors’ mean?

We deduplicate source identities, URLs and duplicate content. Unknown identities do not count as independent authors. We cannot reliably identify the same person across different platforms, so the count has that limitation.

Can I get a refund?

Contact C-Point Labs if there is a problem with your purchase. Statutory rights remain. Immediate digital access requires explicit consent to losing the withdrawal right once access starts. The detailed terms are still a draft pending legal review.

How often do new reports appear?

When a problem meets the evidence threshold and the editorial checks are complete. There is no promised publishing schedule or minimum volume. A subscription covers all published reports while active.

Is this validation?

No. Evidence of a recurring problem does not establish willingness to buy your solution. Use the report to decide who to speak to and what to test next.